8 Things to Know about Acting Attorney General Keisler
Thu Sep 20, 2007 at 07:49:57 AM PDT
On Monday, TPMuckracker noted something hidden in the Michael Mukasey announcement: the appointment of Peter Keisler as Acting Attorney General.
8 things to know about Peter Keisler:
- Keisler was a co-founder of the Federalist Society;
- The Federalist Society was a checkbox in Goodling's evaluation of U. S. Attorneys;
- Keisler oversaw the Administration's fight against habeas corpus for Guantanamo;
- Keisler allegedly interfered with the Tobacco conspiracy trial;
- Keisler received a recess appointment at age 24;
- Keisler testified against extending whistleblower protections using arguments contradicting existing federal statutes;
- Keisler defended secrecy for all Warrantless Surveillance info, arguing that even confirmation or denial of its existence threatens national security;
- Keisler defended the Interior Department in Cobell v. Norton - a tour de force of legal maneuvering and alleged DOJ obstruction of justice.
Extensive research diary continues below fold
Bush's new recess app't: Peter Keisler UPDATE 6 or so
Mon Sep 17, 2007 at 12:45:04 PM PDT
Bush just snuck one by us. He's found a way to have a recess appointment without even a recess.
TPMuckracker focused on an announcement within the announcement of Michael Mukasey: the replacement of Acting Attorney General Paul Clement by Peter Keisler . That is, co-founder of the Federalist Society Peter Keisler will be our Acting Attorney General until someone is confirmed. Clement is gone, Keisler is in, and there's no possibility of congressional review. Abracadabra.
INAPPROPRIATE CAPS: Misleading title 4 exclamation points
Mon Jul 24, 2006 at 09:36:46 PM PDT
Over-familiar sentence introducing diary topic, including the words "guys", "y/all" and/or "hey".
Long introductory statement involving reference to Nixon, or perhaps Reagan, it's hard to tell. Diarist's statement of surprise at being first to discover article everyone's already read. Woefully inadequate sentence diarist believes to be snarky, which serves as introduction to article:
Poorly chosen break between Intro and Extended Body.
Hurricane Pam Exercise Background CD
Sun Sep 04, 2005 at 01:25:15 AM PDT
Update [2005-9-4 21:23:4 by HeyThereItsEric]:: I just figured out that the first link is the Hurricane Pam Exercise Background CD. Title changed to reflect this.
This CD was produced by the Center for the Study of Public Health Impacts of Hurricanes (CSPHIH) at Louisiana State University to aid participants to the Hurricane Pam Exercise better understand the impact of a Category 3 hurricane on the greater New Orleans area as well as SE and Central Louisiana.*
Update [2005-9-4 4:45:2 by HeyThereItsEric]:: It sounds like I need to delete this, but I can't find mention of the "COASTAL LAND LOSS" document elsewhere on Kos [snip]. I hope someone more awake can follow up in a better-written diary.
There are several documents at
http://hurricane.lsu.edu/floodprediction/PAM_Exercise04/
HURRICANE PAM EXERCISE
July 2004
From the document COASTAL LAND LOSS: HURRICANES AND NEW ORLEANS
Floodwaters would have residence times of weeks. The resultant mix of sewage, corpses and chemicals in these standing flood waters would set the stage for massive disease outbreaks and prolonged chemical exposure.
Liberty cannot exist without Privacy
Sat Aug 27, 2005 at 02:07:19 PM PDT
The word "Privacy" leaves me cold.
The concept of "Privacy" makes my heart race. It seems so fundamental to democracy that I can't figure out why people could even argue it. The problem is that they do - or rather, they argue against Privacy as a proxy for something else. "Privacy," as the word is used in the legal sense, sounds like jargon. No matter how precise, jargon can always be painted as abstract and alien to those who are unfamiliar with its actual meaning. All it takes is a little verbal trickery to transfer confusion abut the term to confusion about the topic.
The word "Privacy" doesn't even appear in the Constitution. But the concept pervades it. The concept appears more explicitly in another document - a document of founding principles - in one of the most stunning sentences in political history.
Another reason to love Reid
Wed Apr 27, 2005 at 06:53:59 PM PDT
From USAToday article
Donations link DeLay, ethics panel
WASHINGTON -- All five Republicans on the House ethics committee have financial links to Tom DeLay that could raise conflict-of-interest issues should the panel investigate the GOP majority leader.
Turns out there's some precedent for ethics Committee panel members to recuse themselves from an investigation. Guess who set it? More below.
Republican talking points RE: Ethics
Wed Apr 27, 2005 at 06:46:47 PM PDT
Rawstory has posted a scan of what it believes are the
Republican talking points regarding the Ethics Committee rules reversal. I'm retyping several of the key points here because it is a scan. (Thanks to
Jonathan for the link)
Get out your Lysol; you'll want to disinfect. Reading this is like scooping out a litterbox into your eyes.
House Republicans stand by the changes... but believe it is more important for the institute to have a functioning Ethics Committee that may be flawed, than to have a more perfect, but non-operational Committee.
More below
Ollie North: GOP headed towards train wreck
Thu Apr 21, 2005 at 10:29:54 PM PDT
The dogs are turning on each other. From
Ollie North's April 22nd column at GOPUSA
It's easy to blame liberal Democrats for derailing judicial nominees because it's true. But the GOP locomotive doesn't seem to have anyone at the controls as it heads down the track toward a train wreck.
Time Magazine: I Canceled My Subscription (LTE)
Wed Apr 20, 2005 at 08:14:41 PM PDT
I just sent this message to Time Magazine as an e-mail Letter to the Editor. I had only two issues left, but I just had to cancel right now.
Dear Time Magazine,
I have been a subscriber to your magazine since September of 1993, and witnessed much rich and compelling scholarship in that time. I still keep the September 11th issue on my bookshelf; Nancy Gibb's extraordinary untitled cover story helped me come to grips with the horror of that terrible day.
I have since lost my respect for Time Magazine, and it saddens me.
Bush rating breaks through its support (Harris)
Mon Apr 18, 2005 at 03:03:00 PM PDT
I am tremendously excited by the new Harris poll number that puts the president's disapproval rating at its highest level. Why? Because it broke through a 45% positive, 55% negative support. If Bush's approval were a stock, it's time to sell.
You'll want to read this in the context of this fascinating chart from Pollkatz.